ladymisskirroyale

ladymisskirroyale

Jun 282010
 

The other night, Mr. Royale and I went to see Pavement at the Greek Theater in Berkeley. As we were waiting during that lag time between the opening band and Pavement, a disheveled, rheumy, older man wearing a black sock, a white sock, and pathetically patched pants approached us. He stood in front of our group and stared at us. Eventually, he pointed to Mr. Royale’s equally ripped jeans and slowly drew a sewing kit out of his pocket. He offered it to us, telling us that he was the drummer for Pavement. He asked if we believed him, and we replied that we did not. Instead, I was thinking, this is Berkeley and all that, but how did the homeless dude get in to the show? Later, during the encores, Gary Young scampers up on stage, and we recognize our man. Could he keep the beat? Negotiable. Did he drop the sticks regularly? Certainly. But there was no doubting that the anti-sartorial gentleman was indeed playing drums with Malkmus et. al.

In turning the tables on the theme of The Look, what happens when there is a band member who does not “match” and does not reflect the signifiers of the rest of the band? What are some other examples of this? As many Hall members are also musicians, did you choose or throw out members due to their Look? From previous RTH discussions, it appears that nose hair, clothing, and other visual symbols make or break band cohesiveness, so I welcome your comments and observations.

Share
May 312010
 

There have been two recent mentions of the Cream song, SWLABR. BTW, it was a song I hadn’t heard of and had to look up so that I could get with the RTH program. I’m now ISO other of these acronym songs. Mr. Royale and I could think of three: DMSR by Prince, PYT by Michael Jackson, and IGY by Donald Fagen. FWIW, can you think of others? (One entry per post, of course.)

BFN, LMKR

Share
May 292010
 

Last night Mr. Royale and I went to see The Flight of the Conchords. Brett and Jemaine had their typical witty banter with the crowd but seemed to get annoyed when someone yelled out “Freebird!” They responded that they did not have that song in New Zealand and that the request may be more appropriate at a Lynyrd Skynyrd show. I was sort of surprised to hear their irritation. A bit of research on FOTC and on the WFMU’s Beware of the Blog suggests that FOTC has choreographed this request into their banter, and that many bands are frustrated with this request.

Sometimes the request for “Freebird” is funny due to it’s juxtaposition with the sort of music that is being played. I’ve heard it screamed for at an Atlas Sound show, and Mr. Royale recalls it being requested from a Stereolab show.

I’m thinking that we are done with the tired and the trite. It’s time to start a revolution and request something different at a show. But what????

Share
May 262010
 

IL45YOtbuy0]
I’ve been thinking about the musical choices that bands/musicians/record producers make when mixing a track, and realized that there is whole subgenre of music that could be defined by the complete unintelligibility of the lyrics. Whether the choice to distort or smear over the lyrics was made to heighten the caché of the music (possible examples = My Bloody Valentine, New Order) or to cover up really stupid writing (see My Bloody Valentine, New Order) it can grant an instant point of discussion and, my thesis, make the listening experience even more enjoyable. As someone whose enjoyment of REM is in inverse proportion to the intelligibility of their lyrics, I would tenderly propose that some songs are made better by the obfuscation of the words. Some examples for me include Cocteau Twins, Les Georges Leningrad, later Talk Talk, Liquid Liquid, some Deerhunter, and plenty on the 4AD label. And yours? Think of it as musical Mumblecore.

Share

Lost Password?

 
twitter facebook youtube