Aug 182007
 

After receiving word that RTH’s Senior Correspondent in New Orleans, Townsman BigSteve, was flummoxed by the strange noise heard at roughly 2:40 in the “true stereo” mix of “Fool On the Hill,” RTH Labs engineers donned their white lab coats and went to work.

Upon cursory examination, it was clear to our engineers that the sound was a highly sped-up sample of something — but what? After applying industry-standard pitch manipulation software to the problem, RTH Labs has come to the conclusion that the Abbey Road engineers and/or producers simply grabbed a few feet of existing tape of a single instrument — possibly a guitar track, though horns are not out of the question — and, prior to speeding it up by perhaps as much as two octaves, applied a very heavy tape flange to the product.

Attached is our vastly slowed-down sample for your consideration. As always, we welcome your comments and questions.

Yours sincerely,

Milo T. Frobisher
Chief Engineer
RTH Labs

Share
Aug 082007
 

Losing it

Despite my well-known resistance to the burgeoning Apple iTunes Empire – or perhaps because of it – within weeks of my wife switching us from a PC to a Mac, a representative from Apple contacted me through RTH Labs to gauge my interest in participating in a Phase II study on a digital weight-loss program that is tentatively titled iLose.

I was initially flummoxed by Apple’s interest in my participation, but I could stand to lose some weight, and the promise of a steady supply of preselected, potentially weight-loss promoting tunes was hard to turn down. If nothing else, I figured, I’d get turned onto some new music, get a chuckle out or two, and stick it to the iMan by mocking this experimental program for the benefit of Rock Town Hall. After 3 weeks on the program, however, I’m becoming a believer.

The playlist from my most recent iLose session follows. Consider it a trial version of this possibly revolutionary weight-loss program!

“Clear Spot”, Captain Beefheart & The Magic Band
“Walkin With A Mountain”, Mott The Hoople
“Riot Industry”, Cobra Verde
“Blow Daddy-O”, Pere Ubu
“Allah Wakbarr”, Ofo The Black Company
“The Blue Mask”, Lou Reed
“St. George`s Dragon”, Baby Grandmothers
“Ship Of Fools”, The Doors
“Amazona”, Roxy Music
“You Baby”, The Turtles

Before continuing, please read the following Disclaimer:
DISCLAIMER: The health information contained herein is provided for informational purposes only and is not intended to replace a discussion with a healthcare provider. All decisions regarding patient care must be made with a healthcare provider and consider the unique characteristics of each patient.
Continue reading »

Share
Jul 132007
 

RTH Labs compares “major Seger discovery” to Dead Sea scrolls

WASHINGTON, DC, JULY 12 — AP — RTH Labs Senior Archaeologist Milo P. Ogunquit announced today the unveiling of astonishing footage from 1970, showing RTH patron saint of well-intentioned mediocrity Bob Seger blasting through a white-hot cover of Chuck Berry’s “Carol” while performing at a benefit concert for then-jailed political acitivist John Sinclair.

“Sometimes the most important scientific discoveries are made precisely when one is *not* looking for something,” said Ogunquit. “That was true in this case.” Ogunquit went on to describe how his research staff was in fact seeking vintage Stevie Wonder concert footage when they stumbled across the searing Seger performance. “Unfortunately,” said Ogunquit, “our crack research staff also had to endure nearly an hour of strident — if not outright retarded — political commentary, as well as worthless performances by John Lennon and Allen Ginsburg, to ensure that there was no more than the one song from Bob Seger.” Ogunquit confirmed that the “Carol” performance is the only Seger tune in the grainy film, which was produced in 1971. Ogunquit also said that no RTH Lab staff were injured in the research process.

Ogunquit added: “For those of you who just want to enjoy this extremely rare concert footage of a young and vibrant Bob Seger, note that his performance starts at the point where aproximately 50 minutes remain in the film.” Ogunquit closed his remarks by cautioning RTH Townspeople against watching the Ginsburg performance that precedes Seger’s, saying it could have “psychologically debilitating” effects on viewers.

# # #

Share
Jun 212007
 

Worse

Folks, the chuckles we’ve been getting out of EPG’s dismissive “singin’ through your beard” references have forced the RTH Labs to ponder: Does the growing of a Rock Beard always signal a turn for the creative worse? After numerous meetings, internal research notes, and PowerPoint presentations, my colleagues in the white lab coats say there’s only one way to find out. We need your help!

Here’s what you must do: think of a rock/soul personality who conspicuously grew a beard at some point in their career. Review their creative output prior to the arrival of their neck-felt, and compare it with what came after. Ask yourself this simple question: Did things get better or worse?

NOTE: The goal of this exercise is not to ascertain whether there are any quality bearded rockers out there. We are trying to determine whether the arrival of a beard portends creative flaccidity. Here are a few analyses to get you started:

  • Eric Clapton: WORSE.
  • Bon Scott: WORSE.
  • Robert Plant: WORSE.

I look forward to your responses.

Share
Jun 042007
 

I too was listening to Breakfast With The Beatles this morning and they brought up the “you can hear the air conditioning turn on” thing about the final chord in A Day In The Life. They said you can really only hear it on the wax version. They extracted it and played it and indeed there is something there. They only played it once and I wanted to hear it again so I grabbed my wax and replicated their experiment.

Here is the piano chord as it is played on the original wax. The only change I made was to slowly increase the volume from the beginning to the end so you probably won’t need to crank it up. At about 32 seconds in (3/4ths), you can hear something that just sounds like a pop or scratch:
Take 1

I isolated this bit, maximized the volume and doubled up the tracks and got this. You may need to turn it up a bit to hear it:
Take 2

Interesting right? Maybe, if you’ve never heard this story before. But wait! Then I quadrupled the tracks and slowed them down to 75%. And listen to what is there!:
Take 3

Share
May 142007
 

Pursuant to recent discussions pertaining to the “good”-ness of amplifier modeling technology, technicians in the Rock Town Hall Labs have undertaken a side-by-side comparison, in order to illustrate the innate differences between “real” and modelled amplifiers.

Following is an .mp3 file with four separate “takes” of the same simple riff — in this case, taken from the chorus of Deep Purple’s “Into the Fire”, off of In Rock. The drums and bass are the same in all four takes; only the guitar tracks are different. The first two takes feature (though not necessarily in this order):

  • A Line 6 “Pod” set on “Brit High Gain” — a euphemism for a modern Marshall JCM 2000, set on “Ultra Gain,” or such like, and
  • An actual Marshall JCM 2000, set on “Ultra Gain.”

The second two takes feature (again, not necessarily in this order):

  • A Line 6 “Pod” set on “Brit Classic” — a euphemism for a classic, late ’60s Marshall Plexi or such like
  • A Marshall JCM 2000, set on “Classic Gain” — i.e., modern-day Marshall’s attempt to provide as close to a vintage Plexi tone as possible.

Both “real” amp takes were played through a Marshall JCM 900 Lead 1960B cabinet (4×12), miked close with a Shure SM57.

Here’s what the RTH Labs need from you:

This is *not* an effort to see whether RTHers can tell the difference between “real” and “fake” amps — though if you want to hazard a guess as to which is which, you can do so for extra geek credit. Rather, this is an effort to determine which of each pair of takes is preferable, which in turn may lead us to make conclusions about the overall acceptability of modelling technology.

Note also that this is not an effort to determine which of the four takes you like best, though you’re welcome to share that tidbit as well, if you like. Again: Choose your preference between the first two “high gain” takes, then the “classic gain” takes.

Thank you for your assistance in this effort.

Share

Lost Password?

 
twitter facebook youtube